The bad thing about being a freelance writer is you don’t get paid. The great thing about being a free-lance writer is nobody is going to fire you if you speak your mind. Thank goodness for the latter this morning, because I’m ready to blow at any second. “The problem?” you ask. The problem is the current front-runner in the Republican Presidential Race, Mr. Rick Santorum. You’ll notice I’ve tagged this post “Part I” and the reason is, there’s way too much to say about Santorum and I’m going to need at least three posts to make a dent in the issues. But man, I’ve got a LOT of stuff to discuss.
Some of you may know I’ve recently been writing a series of pieces related to what I see as a concerted and focused War Against Women coming from the right. But Rick Santorum has somehow managed to escalate that war…into a religious CRUSADE. You can almost see him riding on a big white horse, with a giant cross on his vestments, wielding a lance and rallying his forces for the upcoming conquest.
How specifically has he attacked women? Throughout history, men have found the best way to keep women under control, is to keep them “barefoot and pregnant”. How do you keep your woman barefoot and pregnant? Well, first you restrict her access to shoes. Then, you restrict her access to birth control. It’s simple really. Load her up with kids and she’ll stay in her place…at home and cooking her man’s dinner. Rick Santorum has been very clear in his position on birth control. “Many people of the Christian faith have said, ‘Well, that’s OK. Contraception is OK.’ Well, it’s NOT OK. It’s a license to do things in the sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be. It’s not for the purpose of procreation.” This man, the front-runner for President of the United States has a problem with women using birth control. And heaven forbid human beings might somehow experiment in the sacred “sexual realm”. He’s said he “doesn’t want to ban it, but individual states should be allowed to ban it if they want to”. Woooo Hooooo…..get ready all you redneck fella’s in Alabama. You’re gonna be allowed to wear the pants again! The arrogance of this one statement should disqualify Rick Santorum for President.
But what if a woman gets pregnant and, for some reason, decides she cannot go through another pregnancy or she cannot afford to raise another child. Hey America, abortion is still LEGAL in the United States. When I was a kid, they were NOT legal, but they were still plentiful. They were performed by untrained and often unwashed women and men in back alleys and tenement houses and OFTEN resulted in the death of the mother. Rick Santorum has been highly vocal in his opposition to the US Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision. He favors a constitutional amendment to ban abortion in all instances, including pregnancies resulting from rape or incest, and when the health of the mother is at stake. He apparently isn’t aware of the history of abortion in the US, nor does he have a clue about the moral and personal concerns of women and families. He has stated that life begins at conception. Nobody else’s opinion seems to matter. I think this is obviously a question that still hasn’t been answered. Other questions such as “when does a fetus become viable?”. “When does the ‘soul’ enter the body?”, “What does ‘viability’ mean?”, “What is the moral decision when the fetus is physically/mentally impaired?”, “What amount of physical/mental impairment is acceptable?”. TONS of questions that apparently to Rick Santorum, are irrelevant because HE has decided and HE knows the answers. He’s gone so far as to say that doctors who perform abortions should be imprisoned!
Santorum recently came out with his personal view that pre-natal testing of pregnant women should not be covered by health insurance companies. His reasoning? If a woman finds out her child is impaired, she might opt for an abortion! Again, Mr. Santorum, abortion is LEGAL in the US. Terminating a pregnancy is a PERSONAL question that must be answered according to a person’s PERSONAL sense of morality…not YOURS. I can’t imagine the pain a woman or couple might go through when they find out their child is going to be born with no possibility of having any semblance of normal life. Will their child suffer? Will their child be in pain? Will the cost of their child’s care be bearable? Will their child have any quality of life? Apparently Santorum thinks he is the best person to answer those questions and he wants to remove any opportunity for women to make informed choices about their own bodies and their own families. Of course he says women can still get pre-natal screening, but they would have to pay for it out of their pockets. I wonder which “class” will benefit from that distinction?
Santorum of course is also on record as blaming “radical feminists” who have undermined the traditional family by “convincing women that professional accomplishments are the key to happiness”. (I’m guessing that takes away some of his “barefoot and pregnant” options.) He doesn’t want women in the work force, and he’s come out and SAID it….and people APPLAUDED! That’s frightening, misogynistic, and un-American.
Our good friend Rick has also spoken out against women in combat. He claims that fighting “men” would be distracted by their “natural instinct” to protect the poor women-folk. After all, the women might be barefoot! They SHOULD be pregnant and if they’re not, then some negligent man is to blame. But they should certainly NOT be in the military. After all, they have no testicles.
All of these ideals taken together, paint a picture of a man who honestly (this isn’t fake on his part….it’s what he really believes) thinks that women are inferior to men. His view is that women are here to provide an opportunity for men to procreate and that women should be, and naturally are, subservient to men. There’s no other way to look at it.
Now I know there are some women who agree with Santorum’s worldview. I know there are some women, particularly fundamentalist religious women, who feel they should be submissive and subservient to their man. I know there are people who feel women should not be in combat alongside men. What I CAN’T believe though, is that a significant number of Americans are in this camp. Women have been subjugated and relegated to second class citizenship for many millenia and only within the last century have those shackles been lightened. Many brave and noble women (and some men) gave their all so that women could live with some level of dignity and respect. People like Susan B. Anthony, Gloria Steinem, Betty Friedan, and so many others have dedicated their lives for the future of American women. They fought those battles AGAINST men like Santorum. They fought hard and they fought tirelessly. I simply refuse to believe that America is ready to go backwards to a time when women were considered chattel.
So, now it’s clear that Rick Santorum is anti-woman. Tomorrow, I’ll show you why you need to fear the coming THEOCRACY if Santorum is elected.


Right on, Mike! What amazes me is that people actually think this guy is electable. A high school friend of mine who’s become a wealthy and intensely Republican woman was clamoring on Facebook for signatures to get Santorum on the ballot in Indiana. And the whole time I’m thinking…”You’re 38, you’ve been married since the end of college and you only have two perfectly-spaced kids. What kind of hypocrisy does it take for someone who has depended on birth control to manage her family size and take advantage of career opportunities to support Santorum?” The answer? He’s not Romney. (And, I’m guessing, also not Newt, though she didn’t say that.) I think right now Santorum is a blank slate to people who didn’t follow his massive re-election loss in Pennsylvania, and who have no interest in consuming any media outside of Fox news. But that can’t last.
While I think it’s shameful that we can even be considering a candidate like Santorum, I do believe that he won’t have a chance once his anti-family planning, anti-sex, and anti-woman views come to light. In the meantime, though, it’s important for posts like yours to keep coming out since they make the rounds on Facebook. So keep up the good work!
(By the way, I discovered your blog via a post from my niece, a Floridian twenty-something who is both very Christian and very liberal. And in Florida! So keep at it, southernliberalman!)
I agree with you blinky
I am starting to think though, we might be witnessing the demise of Santorum’s candidacy. The news programs are all over his fringe viewpoints and I’m predicting his numbers are going to fall soon. I know I’m doing MY best in that regard. BYW, give my regards and thanks to your niece.
Solidarnosc my friend
From 1975 – 1980 I had the privilege of being the Press Secretary and speech writer for the late Thelma Stovall, Lieutenant Governor of Kentucky. I wrote man speechs for her on the issue of women’s rights as a part of the effort to have the Equal Rights Amendment ratified.
Santorum’s views are identitical to those of KKK conspirator and right-wing anti-equality spokesperson Phyllis Schlafley. I don’t know if she is still alive, but it sounds as though she is is writing his script.
For me, listening to Santorum (and believe me, I avoid it whenever possible) is like reliving a nightmare. And, yes – old Phyllis conspired with the KKK, I saw it myself when I ran into her in a cafe in Houston, TX, back in 1977, as she and some KKK folks were plotting strategy. That incident itself spoke volumns.
I remember Phyllis myself Aj and she was a real right wing nut job…just like Santorum. I’m trying to remember the name of the organization she founded, but my mind is numb right now. I’m proud of your work in support of women’s rights too
Yes, she is still alive I just saw a an interview with her a couple of days ago and she is still at her old tricks. Everything bad that has happened since Eve ate that apple is the fault of of the radical feminist.
You notice the whole concept of barefoot and pregnant, the woman staying home, just assumes one can afford to be a one-income family. You’re really only talking about a small portion of the population at that point, as most families simply can’t afford the stay-at-home model.
And no birth control, makes this problem worse, as more children will be born, more women will work, more kids will be latch-keyed.
Let us never forget, making abortion illegal, not only results in all of the things you cite, for the poor. But those with means can easily jump on a plane, and get one in Canada, or Mexico, or Europe. So making abortion illegal, really doesn’t stop abortions, it just stops abortions for those who can’t afford a trip like that–so more poor kids are produced, more of a burden on those social programs–Oh right, Republicans are trying to eradicate those, so the fresh, new, unwanted kids can be starved too.
Excellent points James. Santorum is also on record, opposing two-income families. He doesn’t want women working and he has no clue how hard it is to make ends meet in our economy. Thanks to his party and their failed “trickle down” theories, the middle class is drowning.
Yes! Thank you for adding the class-level analysis here… it’s so important to this discussion. (And I’m sure Santorum would love to do away with TANF and medicaid, which would further jeopardize the livelihood of children in working poor families.) UGH!
For the record, Phyllis Schlafly is not only alive, but a party in re-translating the Bible. The new translation shows Jesus as the kick-ass macho man he really was and isn’t as hard on those poor rich folks. Oh, and it downplays all that “peace” stuff. Everyone knows that real Christians are always aching for a rumble with the agents of Satan. http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bible_Retranslation_Project&oldid=594461
Thanks James,
You’ll enjoy tomorrow’s post….Santorum’s Theocracy plans
Isn’t Schlafly’s group the “Eagle Forum”. I think it is the height of arrogance that she would presume to reinterpret the Bible and then share it. Anyone’s personal interpretation of something like the Bible is “personal” – and not necessarily relevant to anyone but themselves. It amazes me that the right wing continues to want to impose their beliefs on everyone else.
YES….the Eagle Forum. Another sad excuse for neanderthal thinking. Thanks Aj.
A re-translation of the Bible?! By Phyllis Schlafly!? Now I really have heard it all. She might want to have a look at the very end of Revelation, where it says: “And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.” I suspect that refers specifically to Revelation, but nevertheless, it is very risky to mess with the Book. In any case, I thought Schlafly was a lawyer. When did she learn Hebrew and Greek?
What is the “King James Version” of the Bible but a personal interpretation that has been published and widely accepted? Remember, there is no native English version of the Bible.
Every time I think Santorum has shot himself in the foot so utterly and completely that no one could ever possibly take him seriously ever again, he opens his mouth and spews out more ignorant and sexist vitriol! I can’t believe people actually want him to become president.
Me either Catherine. That’s why I am working so hard to let people know what a scumbag he is. He panders to the low-information religious right and sadly, he finds support. It blows my mind
I know, my blood pressure rises whenever I think about any of the GOP candidates. Santorum, however really makes my blood pressure skyrocket! He’s so obviously unintelligent and sexist. It’s slightly depressing that he can even run for office. But, I do think that once his antiquitated views come under even more intense scrutiny, he’ll be bumped off the ticket. One can only hope…
Why thank you. ^^
Women are people with vaginas and the ability to carry and birth a child, that is it. Because women can concieve,carry, and birth a child, the onus is on them and them alone to attend to birth control. My question is why? Because we are biologically made in a certain way as to enable life to continue on the planet, does this mean that we should ONLY be allowed to procreate, to the exclusion of having careers and interests outside the procreational realm? Why don’t men just farm women out to procreate, pay them a stipend, and have huge dormitories of pregnant women, doing their duties and procreating their asses off…the point I am trying to make is that this whole discussion IGNORES the male part in procreation, if women can hold that aspirin between their knees, well, should not men keep that zipper zipped as well? Come on men, do your part, with zippers zipped and aspirin between the knees we can conquer the ‘libertine sexuality’ that is overtaking our country and the world…
You’re preaching to the choir here Marcy. I just continue to be amazed at the huge numbers of WOMEN who claim to support Santorum. I don’t get it. and some men do take responsibility for birth control and RESTRAINT. I agree, it should be shared, but you’re still fighting against a neanderthal type of attitude.
Marcy, you are right. But Santorum’s view could be taken further: I am post-menopausal, which means I can’t get pregnant no matter how hard I might try. So I must be obsolete, and not worth keeping around. So does Rick think he has the right to come to my house and shoot me?
Marcy,
This may be a slippery slope, but your idea of huge dorms full of baby machines could be around the corner if Santorum gets his way.
For example, if fetal citizenship passes, some politicians may feel that some woman are not trustworthy enough to take care of the “citizen” inside them. They may fear they would get a back alley doctor or fly off to another country and claim a miscarraige when they return.
So, they may propose that single women, who do not have the control of a good Christain husband to vouch for them, might just need to be shipped off to some kind of a special jail, where they can keep an eye on them.
Again, this is a stretch, but if abortion becomes illegal, the extremes have won, and nothing will be off the table.
I am a very liberal, evangelistic Christian. Some say you can’t be all of those things. Sure you can, you just have to learn to think for yourself, weigh all the options and opinions and then do what is right.
Santorum is scary, thank God that his views are dismissed by most of the population. What is downright scary is the notion that WOMEN can be swayed by his words.
It seems to me that he got “religion” when he realized that no one was taking him seriously on other issues. He speaks double talk in trying to explain his remarks away. He attacks the President about his beliefs and begins to sound like so many that dismiss his Christian faith, choosing to believe that he is a Muslim.
I truly believe that the Santorum surge will fade when people listen carefully to his ideas, they are Draconian to say the least, they relegate women to the “good old days” when to speak your mind, ask for equal rights and the same health care as men were considered wrong. Well, I am a 73 year old woman that does not want to go backwards, my daughters and granddaughters deserve the best future possible. It won’t happen with Santorum!
I love your passion Carol and you’re spot on with your comments about Christianity and women’s rights. They certainly should be compatible and I hope you continue to speak out. By the way, tomorrow I’m devoting my whole blog to Santorum and religion. That’s the part that frightens me personally.
There’s no hyphen in “freelance.”
Thanks
Ricky says that sex ought to be only for reproduction? Does that mean when his wife reaches menopause they won’t do the nasty anymore? Cuh-rud, does that mean that right now, they only do it twice a month during a one week period? No wonder the guy is so repressed sexually. For your sake and ours, Rick, get on Viagra and steroids! Quick!
Are you sure you want him to actually reproduce MORE Roz? Thanks for reading and for commenting.
Yikes! Didn’t think of that. Besides, he probably turns off the missus by not taking off that sweater vest when they bump uglies.
What I’m not seeing anywhere in the media is the fact that Santorum himself is not a traditional “Christian”. No, I don’t mean that because he’s Catholic. I mean it because he’s a Dominionist/New Apostolic Reformation extremist. Just google those terms and the 7 Mountains theory and you’ll see exactly what he’s up to. I also urge everyone to read Chris Hedges’ “American Fascists” as well as Jeff Sharlet’s “The Family” and “C Street”. This movement has deep roots in our government and American society. It’s dangerous and we need to take it seriously.
You hit the nail on the head Melanie. He’s a fringe theocrat and we need to make SURE he stays out of power. btw, love Sharlet’s work, especially “The Family”
I am reading “The Family” for the second time. These people want to take over the world in the name of Jay-zus. It’s frightening that so many have drunk this Kool-Aid! I’m looking forward to your post tomorrow!
Thanks Cheryl. I’m glad you enjoyed my piece and I’m working on tomorrow’s edition now
Personally I didn’t think anyone could make Romney look even a teeny bit viable, but then this person came along. Ugh, there is nothing that I read about him that I like, even a little bit. This article didn’t even touch on his thoughts about how we don’t need to be funding public education and kids should be home schooled! Frightening, truly frightening.
Three cheers for this article!
Kara, tune in again tomorrow and Thursday and you’ll see more. I haven’t forgotten about the schools, social safety nets, and especially his quest for a theocracy. Thanks for reading and for the kind words.
I would suggest that the level of sexual repression goes beyond hatred for women or bigotry towards women ,and more towards a personal pathology, trauma or repression due to some unknown circumstances which have yet to be revealed. Did something happen to him on the grounds of the VA hospital where he was isolated growing up?
I don’t know but I do know he is not a healthy person and the imbalances he shows would have anyone else in the psychiatrist office. This is a dangerous person to even allow to run for president. Be wary of writing him off as too much of a nut job to get elected. The fundamental churches will bus many loads of ignorant voters without many questions asked ! We cannot take this election for granted !
Listen to the Loretta Lynn song, The Pill, which came out around 1975 for a view of how relieved those women were to have the option of having a break from the oppression of having babies every year. It is as honest of a song as ever written, like no one but Loretta can express.
I couldn’t have said it better Kathy. I honestly thing Santorum has deep seated emotional issues. Interesting thing about his wife though. It’s my understanding before meeting Santorum, she lived with a much older man who was a doctor. He was also an OBGYN an her performed abortions. Apparently she was pro-choice until the met the anti-christ
Thanks, Southernliberalman! So glad to read your article. A lifelong republican, I changed affiliations back in the summer because of what I was seeing as a war on women (hadn’t heard the phrase yet, but was seeing it happening). A man I was arguing with the other day said, “Why are you women getting so upset? We let you vote.” WE LET YOU VOTE! A year ago, people wouldn’t have dared say these things, but something has changed, and I don’t know what it is, but it is scaring me, and suddenly the Handmaid’s Tale isn’t seeming so silly. Women fought hard for their rights, including the right to vote; they sacrified, went to jail, were beaten; but they never could have accomplished it without the help of some of the enlightened men of the day. And we will continue to need you enlightened men to help fight off these attacks on our independence and autonomy. One male friend of mine frequently says, “Free women mean free men.” As long as any of us are oppressed, none of us are truly free.
Thanks Crystal and thanks too to your friend for that great quote. I love it. And you’re right, it’s going to take all of us working together just to keep the radical right from dragging us backwards 100 years. Thanks so much.
Here’s something I don’t think Santorum and others like him understand; I female 58, single and have no children. I’m not alone, I know many women who are like me, some are divorced, some widowed, but all are between 40 and 60 years old and never had kids for whateve reason. Santorum doesn’t want us to work, my question is just what are we supposed to do? Drop dead? We are still contributing members of society, we go to school, we teach, we pay taxes. We are people, full humans. Just because we didn’t find or lost the man who we might have wanted to build a life with and we never had childern does not make us less.
Also can the US really afford to lose not only single women but married women in the work force? I don’t think so. All my married female friends work too, they are nurses, business analysts, nannies, system’s analysts, shop owners, etc. They not only generate income for their families, they pay taxes to support Federal, State and local governments. Some of them earn enough to pay the big bills in the family; the mortage, medical bills, car payments, while the husband buys the food, pays the utilities. For others it is the exact opposite situation. But in every case they are contributing to society and to their families. What would happen to the US without them generating tax revenues? What would happen to their families with out their incomes?
Rick Santorum doesn’t seem to have considered these questions at all. He just sees his own little world where he has enough money that his wife can stay home, (where is she btw, (I never see her beside him) and take care of the kids and home school them. His statements on home schooling are wrong too, Past Presidents didn’t homeschool their childern themselves, they may have helped but for the most part the upper classes hired tutors to teach their childern, live in teachers. Also the reason why states started requiring childern to go to institutional schoos was because too many of those kids coming off the farm and trying to work in factories didn’t have enough education to do their new jobs safely and they couldn’t read the instructions. Santorum is correct that currect schools came about because of industrialization. But aren’t we still mostly an industrial society? Santorum wants to go to war with all of Islam and China and just about everybody else. And who does he think is going to build his weapons, some poor kid who can’t read the words “Caution: High Explosives”?
I would think that Santorum is a big joke given what he says, (I can’t believe the stumbling way he says things either), but it seems there are a lot of people out there who believe in what he says. I am very afraid that the world may not survive if Santorum becomes President of the US while Ahmadinejad is President of Iran. I think everyone who does not believe what either of these men says should be very afraid.
both Santorum and Ahmadinejad are theocrats. That’s always dangerous and I share your concerns. By the way, excellent comment Nightcloud. Thank you.
I wanted to add something on this home school thing…
What happens when the parents are not well educated? In a public school it wouldn’t matter, your tearchers have been trained for the specific purpose of teaching. Yet, in Santorum’s mind, all parents are somehow able to reproduce the education they would get at school.
What if your parents are idiots, lousy teachers, or in the case of the Santorums, think all you need to know is in the Bible? What are your chances at being prepared for careers in medicine, science, engineering or other difficult fields? Let’s not forget the issue of just what are parents suppose to teach.
Good questions Morris. I really don’t think Santorum has thought this through at all. I’m writing a follow up article tomorrow on the religious aspects of Santorum’s mania, and on Thursday, I’ll be commenting on his ideas regarding the function of government, econommics, and more. Thanks Morris.
In response to Morris: “I wanted to add something on this home school thing… What happens when the parents are not well educated? In a public school it wouldn’t matter, your tearchers have been trained for the specific purpose of teaching. Yet, in Santorum’s mind, all parents are somehow able to reproduce the education they would get at school. What if your parents are idiots, lousy teachers, or in the case of the Santorums, think all you need to know is in the Bible? What are your chances at being prepared for careers in medicine, science, engineering or other difficult fields? Let’s not forget the issue of just what are parents suppose to teach.”
Let me answer that as a former homeschooler. At the time I homeschooled my children, I had only a high school education (I have since added to that with a college education). But I maintain that anyone who can read can teach. I taught my children to read, write, do basic algebra, and we had a lot of fun with science! Today, my 28 year old son is an award winning investigative journalist, and my daughter is also an award winning writer. They are two of the most literary people I know, and I consider them both successes. Additionally, most towns have homeschooling communities with parents who have specialties is different areas, and loan their expertise to help each other fill in any gaps. And socialization was never an issue for my children. They socialized with a diverse group of people growing up, and when they were in junior high and high school (at that point,i was no longer homeschooling), they had three years of cotillion to teach them proper etiquette at social events, and even learned ballroom dancing (I learned alot about social etiquette and ballroom dancing from them!). Please dont’ let the RIck Santorums of the world make homeschooling look like a bad idea. It’s one of the things I definitely did right with my kids! And by the way, one of my inspirations was a family in California who had four sons (two by birth and two adopted–one black and one from China). They homeschooled them all the way through school, and all four received full rides to Harvard. It’s a fact that one of the best ways to learn is to teach, and teaching my children to love literature and to write so beautifully taught me so much. It was one of the best experiences of my life.
@southerliberalman,
Since the school issue is part of your next blog, I had something to add…
I am sure Santorum will eventually backtrack on this and say he feels private schools can fill in the gap.
So, then I must ask how do poor kids afford private school? Does Santorum want to give them money for it? This would seem to contradict his postion on entitlements of any kind (except for medicare ’cause old people will freak). Perhaps he can tweak Gingrich’s position on poor kids and let them be janitors for the kids who do have the money for school.
Also, what happens when you live where it isn’t profitable for a company to provide a school? Given that some schools will have a monopoly, can they charge anything they want? Is your only option to move or home school? He may actually take this postion, but I don’t think it will sit well with some of his supporters, who might live in small rural towns.
P.S. I am a southern man myself, and want woman to know I am with you too.
@Crystal Kline,
Thanks for your comment. I would like to stress that I am not down on home schooling at all. I have 3 friends who do it and their children are great students.
My point is that it is not possible for all of us to home school. Aside from the fact that it is not always feasible for one parent to stay home (not to mention single parents) it is not possible for everyone to do as good of a job as you and your friends.
You state: “But I maintain that anyone who can read can teach.”
I disagree. I think a loving involved parent can probably do a better job than many teachers, but the fact of the matter is not every parent can teach or has the required education to do so. You happen to be very capable, but parents who home school tend to know they are capable. You also have the option of backing out if it gets to be too much. If every parent were suddenly required to home school, there would be complete chaos and a large portion of a generation would not be adequately educated.
You state: “I taught my children to read, write, do basic algebra, and we had a lot of fun with science!”
That is great, but today basic algebra is already being taught at the 5th and 6th grade level. What if your children needed to be ready for a career in math, science, medicine or engineering? These fields are getting pretty competitive, and most students going into these fields are not only getting courses in trig and college algebra, but already getting into differential and integral calculus. Let’s not forget computer programming. High school students are doing pretty intense programming these days, and many are getting exposed to C++. You may have had fun with science, but are you capable of teaching high school level physics and chemistry?
I know you think local associations can pick up the slack, and they probably can on the scale you are involved in, but to do away with the Department of Education on federal and local levels and basically say “All you parents will home school or find a private school” is not possible in today’s world.
I know you are just defending home schooling and I agree it is great. My concern is that voters may accept solutions like Santorum’s, without really thinking everything through. His solution is a gimmick to draw voters, and nothing more.
Respectfully,
Morris
How ever do I say THANK YOU for this amazing perspective?
As a woman who is offended, appalled and, frankly, terrified that my body, my rights, my human right, and my dignity are a NATIONAL CONVERSATION and political platform…
As a woman who fought to have children…
As a woman who works and who works with her husband to achieve a workable balance of work, family and life…
As a middle-aged(ish) woman who takes hormones for health reasons…
As a woman who would so much rather keep all of this private because by gum it’s very personal and not really anyone’s business much less politicians and I am stunned that the same party that demands “small government” can also appoint itself my moral authority…
Thank you.
Julie,
Exactly right. My hope is that other people will wake up and see what’s happening before it’s too late. And that “small government’ thing only seems to apply when someone needs our help. Thanks
This asshole deserves to be shot this is 2012 women have rights and as a hard working woman and mother I have decided to have no more children and I will NEVER have a man tell me what I can or cannot do I. Will now be voting even though I wasn’t planning on it every person has a right to their own believes and this is making government way to personal
Thanks Katrina. You’re exactly right..
You may know about Rick 3 y.o. daughter that has Trisomy 18. This is a terrible genetic disease that has numerous disfiguring physical symptoms and heart defects, including a hole between the heart’s upper (atrial septal defect) or lower (ventricular septal defect) chamber, defects of the lungs, kidneys, and stomach/intestines. Most are still born, only 10% live to their first year. If they live they face multiple surgeries and require incredible care.
Well, I just saw a photo today of another daughter hard to tell age since they are usually very small in stature but probably 10 – 14. I know he has 7 children. Now to me continuing to bring children into the world that are going to have that kind of life is a sin. I guess this is why he so rabid on genetic amniocentesis.
You know, Ricky Boy is so concerned about people doing things in the sexual realm that are counter to “how things are supposed to be”… one could argue that bringing those children into the world is counter to how things are supposed to be, especially since we have the technology to determine Trisomy 18. Not so long ago, they would have died, and in many places, including the animal kingdom, they would have been left behind or put out of their misery.
Sounds like somebody’s genes aren’t a good match and it’s time to quit procreating.
He doesn’t see it as a sin, because he doesn’t understand the hardship that most people would face trying to take care of one child with such a severe illness. He’s under the mistaken assumution that everyone could pay the medical bills and special needs that such a child would have. He can pay for 24/7 care givers, teachers and all the hospitalizations, but how in the world would a family making 50 to 60K a year deal with it? Many families would have to institutionalize such a child. I’ve worked in one such institution, it was a really good one, all the kids were well taken care of, and babied, but the staff was short and over worked. We did our very best and took good care of them, but many of us wondered why some of them were born.
You have forgotten a fundamental concept of Catholic faith-they believe that we are in the world to suffer and it brings us closer to God. Santorum probably feels that he is doing his children a favor by bringing them into the world in such a situation. After all, when they die God will reward them for their suffering. Mother Teresa used to tell the suffering poor in Calcutta that when they felt the agony of their diseases “God is kissing you.” so they would appreciate their pain.
I wonder too, Nightcloud. Frothy also doesn’t understand the fact that some of us would *not want* a child like that, plenty of money or not. I would not hesitate to abort if I were carrying a child with any serious genetic disorder… frankly, I would consider it my duty to not only myself and my family, but also to the world.
I read his full statement this morning regarding childern born with Down’s Syndrome. I know many of them have good lives especially when they are young and have their parents around, and some are taken care of by their siblings when the parents pass.
But many don’t have those things, their parents pass and they are left alone. Having Down’s symdrome doesn’t keep you from having any of the senior dementia illnesses either. A person who had a functional level of ablitiy can lose it in old age and become very needy. Again I worked in another nursing home, it is a very sad thing to see a 60+ woman with the mentality of a 1-2 year old who has terminal cancer and she can’t understand why she is in constant pain.
He is entitled to his personal beliefs and practices as all Americans are and should be, but they need to remain personal and not a talking point for a presidential candidate.
We threw him out of PA for his radical views and the more he opens his mouth he will continue to lose supporters (God willing). Stay out of my bedroom and decisions I or any other woman makes about their body!
Absolutely! If a political candidate doesn’t trust me to make my own decisions, I don’t trust him or her to govern. It’s really that simple.
I hope when Rick Santorum reincarnates (not that he believes in reincarnation) he comes back as a sexually abused woman.
karma is a bitch, isn’t it? LOL
I can understand why so many women support Santorum’s war against women’s rights. They don’t want to work. They believe the fantasy that if they stay home with a man to “take care of them” they won’t ever have to work. Afterall, June Cleaver and Harriet Nelson had wonderful lives. Even Carol Brady had a servant to take care of the household duties and allow her all the perks of being a “wife and mother” without any of the real domestic work. In the magically perfect Santorum World they would stay home, wearing dresses and pearls, dusting the house occasionally and fixing dinner for their husbands, then meeting them at the door with their slippers and pipe and a pitcher of martinis to hold them over until dinner. No real work, no demanding bosses, no commuting or worry about money, or anything really, just drifting happily along with no real responsibilities.
Remember, Disney Princesses always “live happily ever after” with no effort, why shouldn’t they? That is the appeal of Santorum to women. The abrogation of responsibility for themselves. The return to childhood where “Daddy” took care of them and they didn’t have to fend for themselves. Stupid, shortsighted and selfish, since the fantasy is just that, but I can understand the lure.
Wow, I sat here reading all this, and I noticed that a lot of hatred has been spewed here. I guess you could say I’m one of those “Right wing nuts”, and I can’t personally stand to listen to the bile that Santorum spews. Almost every debate I’ve listened to, I’ve had to mute him for fear that he may give me a migraine. I’ve served this nation in the Air Force, and I stand with the military point of view on this matter- The only republican that is even electable, and the only person that can save this nation from falling is Dr. Ron Paul. Even good ol’ uncle Barry (aka. the left wings beloved Barack Hussein Obama) is talking about more war, and why not. His backers for re-election are the same people that back Newt Gingrich. Who may that be, you may ask. Goldman and Sachs, who by the way, have a totally Pro Israel agenda. Even the Israeli minister believes that Dr. Paul is right on us no longer policing the globe. If Santorum has it his way, not only will WOMEN be stuck barefoot and pregnant, a HOLY CRUSADE will begin, and there’s nothing the people can do to stop it. I will be voting this year, and I can tell you, Santorum is not MY choice. Anyone willing to vote for him after how badly he screwed up PA should be hogtied and forced at gunpoint to sit through about fifty years of Mr. Rogers Neighborhood, since they obviously never saw it while Mr. Rogers was still alive. The fact that he’s even thought to be in mind as a candidate is an offense to the American way of life. The one thing that people don’t get to see on mainstream media, which everyone get there election coverage from, is that in the states Santorum “won” he didn’t get the delegates. in the part we’re in right now, the peoples vote doesn’t count. It’s what the delegates want, and the delegates want Mit Romney and Ron Paul. I believe those two can finally make things right in this nation. and before any of you think to ask, I’M NOT MIDDLE CLASS. When Obama ran for president, he was only talking about helping the middle class. What about those of us below the poverty range? Do we even matter? When you make over $400,000 a year for the rest of your life, I guess not. Obama care is a joke, and should be treated as one. All we get with that farce is the oppertunity to get medical insurance from the highest possible bidder, and who picks up the check on that? Oh, that’s right, the lower class who can’t afford to have it taken out of their paychecks due to the continued ruination of the dollar. The federal reserve under the Obama administration somehow manages to “lose” 16 TRILLION dollars, but no one seems to care. Whitney Houston dies, the whole nation goes nuts and gets stupid. A hate monger spews what we all know he will, and everyone stops to call him a hate monger. Guess what people, we already know. I don’t expect the RNC to take him as their candidate (mainly because there’s no way he can stand a chance against Obama) and if they do, I’m leaving this once great nation. Get up in arms. If you want a good, clean race, vote for Dr. Paul in the primaries. If he gets on the ballot, at least Obama will actually have to make it interesting. He’ll have to work for it this time.
Rick Santorum is frightening to me because he appears to have no grasp of why there was a separation between the church and state law – why we have a secular government. His assumption is that it is both right and good that Christian law be the foundation for the legal system in America. Well, I grew up in South Africa in the bad old days. It was a Christian country. Calvinist theology is strong there, and the laws of the nation were based upon it. I don’t have to explain the hypocrisy of this to most of you I’m sure, so when I see Santorum with his complete faith in the goodness and rightness of Christian values forming the basis for our legal system, I think of where I grew up and what that meant to the majority of the people living there at the time. South Africa now has a secular legal system, and I will always support secular government because I believe it is the only way to prevent discrimination and ensure equality for all.
you need to read my latest blog. It’s about Santorum and his views on theocracy
you’re right, I should’ve – don’t know if you can bump my post over there or not, but it’s probably more appropriate for that one.
Santorum is only one member of the christian taliban which is on a crusade against women and they won’t be happy until all american women are shrouded in burkas. Congress is full of these radicals and they control numerous state governments. These are the same people who preach about liberty and freedom and getting government out of our lives. But wait, there are exceptions to what the hypocrites preach. They DO want government to control uteruses, ovaries, contraception, who you marry, who you sleep with and what sexual activities you engage in. They are totally obsessed with sex and want to impose christian sharia law on all of us. These are very scary, dangerous people.
I always emailed this weblog post page to all my associates,
because if like to read it after that my contacts will
too.
Thanks ortho! You’ve inspired me to get back on the keyboard. More coming this weekend.
Oh, I am glad. I’ve missed the blog and hoped ou are doing well, but just overwhelmed, (as I am) by the current political news in this country.
warming up my fingers now Nightcloud. I’m thinking about the GOP’s continual sabre-rattling and the Mittster in particular!